Presence: An Exploration of Profound Change in People, Organizations, and Society
Peter Senge, C. Otto Scharmer, Joseph Jaworski, and Betty Sue Flowers
2005 Currency Doubleday 0-385-51624-X
The central tenet of this book is the presentation of a new theory, the Theory of
U, which consists of the three principles of Sensing, Presencing, and
Realizing. As the authors move, disjointedly, through the book they
expose the seven core capacities and activities they claim make up the
three principles.
- Suspending
- Redirecting
- Letting Go
- Letting Come
- Crystallizing
- Prototyping
- Institutionalizing
I
have not read every change and organizational learning volume ever
authored, and there is occasionally a quote or idea I do not recognize.
But I have read enough on Buddhism, talked at length with enough
Buddhists, and visited enough temples to recognize Buddhism when I see
it. Thats what this is, wrapped in enough in modern quotes, cultural
references, and soft-science to possibly confuse the uninitiated. But
thats what it is.
There are a number of unfounded
assertions and unsupported propositions, such as author Betty Sue
Flowers statement that the economic myth weve been in for most of
the past century isnt serving us well either. Such global indictments
are not self-evident, and need to be supported. How does one claim that
the incredible advances of the 20th century in productivity,
purchasing power, life span, health care, and leisure time for example
experienced by 100s of millions of people, in market-based economies,
over a 100 year span of time is a myth?
If such claims are going to be taken as anything more than fanciful flights to La La
Land you need to offer substantial support, including your criteria,
your reference points, and whether there are any valid counter
positions. This book never offers any of the above, providing only
anecdotes and/or random quotes to support its global assertions. One
such example a regional health care system in Germany offers a
model for doctor-patient communication that only academics will find
meaningful. The rest of us will find the demarcations rather trite.
Doctors can talk to you about:
- what is broken
- why its broken
- how your behavior may or may not contribute to the break
- and then the fourth level, where they become your psychoanalyst, best friend, and spouse.
If
you are not already getting levels 1-3 you should find a better doctor.
How the authors get from level 3 to level 4 is beyond me, as is why
they think this sort of relationship is something everyone wants.
This
is just one of many examples of underlying assumptions the authors have
made which have no basis in reality. Yet its difficult to argue with
much of the book because it is so experiential. The authors who are
all highly intelligent, highly educated academics genuinely feel they
are on a journey of deep personal transformation. The book is rife with
their emotive insights as they weave fragile webs of connectivity
between tiny slivers of thought, philosophy, and (minimal) data.
But
what the book ultimately proposes is far from original, and the
authors conceit in claiming invention of a new metaphysics around the
Theory of U is a sign that they have gone too far down the rabbit
hole of academic delusion (usually brought on by infinitely deeper
research into infinitely smaller ideas.)
The reality is
there is nothing here with which to argue, nothing of substance with
which to take issue. In the true spirit of the authors learnings, Im
not even sure this book exists. If you think Buddhism, or its myriad
new-age variants, will save the world then you may find some value
here, but you can find much better volumes with a little effort. If you
are not already convinced of such things this book offers nothing that
will change your mind.
I bought Presence based on a
single, rave review by a weblog author and the credentials of the
books four authors. Had I put in even a little effort to read the
Amazon reviews before buying I would have saved myself $30. Still, I
should have known better when the opening anecdote of the book is the
story of a group cry at a South African management retreat. There is
lots of crying in this book, like author Joseph Jaworskis story of
going to Baja, becoming one with a whale, returning to share the story
with his three colleagues, and then having a good group cry over the
profoundness of the moment. None of this was inherently bad, but it was
quite disappointing. Do yourself a favor. Dont buy books based on a
single review of a biased (and we all are) weblog author. That is doubly true if the biased weblog author is me. You've been warned.
|