Search this site: [Advanced Search]
 

Messages: 3 of 3. Pages: 1
Comments/Replies (2) appear below in chronological order. Comment form is at bottom of page.
Read The Bills (#2118)
Posted: 4/27/2007; 11:21 PM by Terry Frazier
Reply | Trackback URL | Weblog Permalink

There are 160 pages of Congressional bills listed at WashingtonWatch.com. 160 pages, at ~20 bills per page.

Keeping up with legislation, cyberstyle

WashingtonWatch is a site that summarizes legislation pending before Congress, and allows user comments on each piece of legislation.  The site is nice and clean, and the explanations proposed laws are clear and understandable.

The home page lists all the legislation currently pending, but grouped by tabs for categories such as: Most Popular, Newest, Greatest Cost, and Greatest Savings.  If you click on a proposed law it will take you to a page where you can leave a comment about the legislation.  Also, users can edit the section that describes why the legislation should or shouldn't be passed.  Sort of like Wikidpedia, except probably with more controversy as the site becomes more popular.

What’s wrong with this picture? This is a great site, but it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that we don’t need 635 largely self-serving, ego-centric, half-witted politicians voting on 3,000+ ways to pick our pockets and screw up our lives. Because you know - you just know – they haven’t actually read any of them.

The only bill any of these clowns should be voting for right now is this one – Read The Bills Act. Of course, the Law of Unintended Consequences says even this bill will make things worse. Hat tip to Ernie.

RE: Read The Bills (#2120)
Posted: 4/28/2007; 5:17 PM by Guest Account  In Response To: 2118
Reply form is at bottom of page.
Thanks for mentioning the Read the Bills Act. We too think Washington Watch is a wonderful service.

I noticed, however, you linked to Gene Healy's column about why even Read the Bills might not work. Sure, everything produces unintended consequences. Healy, while clever, admits not reading the bill. Those who are familiar with DownsizeDC.org can tell you that even we don't claim that this bill will solve all problems. It's one piece of a large and complex puzzle.

Which brings me to the the real problem with Mr. Healy's column -- it's out of date. DownsizeDC.org introduced a bill dealing with delegation -- addressing Mr. Healy's specific concern. It's called the Write the Laws Act.

Healy's right, as far as it goes, but we would suggest that his complaint doesn't go far enough. Not only is the doctrine moribund in government operations, but even most Constitution-oriented folks don't understand the problem of unconstitutional delegation and how large it looms.

Of the few who get it, I've yet to come across any real solutions. We'd like to think that we've found a way to make this issue not only educational, but also interesting with a real solution that could actually work.

When is Anonymity Bad? (#2121)
Posted: 4/29/2007; 12:44 PM by Terry Frazier  In Response To: 2118
Reply form is at bottom of page.
When it keeps your post from getting the exposure it deserves here on good ole b.cognosco. Someone who appeared to be from DownsizeDC.org made a comment on my post about the Read The Bills Act. I wish I knew who it was. They made a couple of good points.

My weblog system requires that you logon to post a comment - this significantly reduces comment spam. But to make logon as non-intrusive and painless as possible I provide a preconfigured guest account for people to use. However, I ask that they sign their name to posts when using the Guest Account. Some do. Some don't.

Total Messages: 3. Pages: 1

Trackbacks

What other weblogs are saying about this topic. Trackback URL: http://www.terryfrazier.com/2118/trackback

Reply to message #2118...

You must logon before posting a reply

You must login to your account to post a comment. If you do not have an account you can create one here. It's a bit inconvenient but only takes a moment and helps control spam and other bad actors.