Search this site: [Advanced Search]
 

Messages: 1 of 1. Pages: 1
Comments/Replies (0) appear below in chronological order. Comment form is at bottom of page.
Utah CIO On The Value Of Silly Patents (#426)
Posted: 8/15/2002; 8:30 PM by Terry Frazier
Reply | Trackback URL | Weblog Permalink
I appreciate Phil Windley's view on silly patents given my recent study of same in the graphic arts. I suspect Windley is right that pursuing patent enforcement, especially of questionable methods and processes, is a costly endeavor and one that not many companies can withstand.

Of All the Stupid....

Yesterday I wrote about IM Bots.  A pretty cool idea.  Today I see in this Internet World article that ActiveBuddy has won a patent on the idea.  I'm not a rabid anti-patent kind of guy, but this one seems pretty wimpy.  There's plenty of prior art (like this Eliza IRC bot  from June 1999).  But whats more, small companies rarely win by having a patent.  That's for IBM and other large companies who can employ hundreds of corporate attorneys.  Even there most of them primarily use their patents defensively rather than offensively.  The best way for a company like ActiveBuddy to win in the market is to spend their time and money on innovation, not in the courtroom. 

I once had business dealings with a company called CoolSavings.  They have a patent on online coupons.  They spent so much time trying to convince us that we had to do business with them or they were going to come after us in court that we never did get to a business deal.    I don't think its a smart way to do business. 

[Windley's Enterprise Computing Weblog]
Total Messages: 1. Pages: 1

Trackbacks

What other weblogs are saying about this topic. Trackback URL: http://www.terryfrazier.com/426/trackback

Reply to message #426...

You must logon before posting a reply

You must login to your account to post a comment. If you do not have an account you can create one here. It's a bit inconvenient but only takes a moment and helps control spam and other bad actors.