| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecently
Discover Common Goals to Unite Your Team
Utah CIO On The Value Of Silly Patents The Extortion Business Model Does Walmart Buy American? Personal VPN Recommendations Detail on Directory Browsing and File Rendering Klogging Roles BN.com Faced With NASDAQ Delisting Entrepreneurs Need to Know the New PR The RIAA Wouldn't Lie Protecting Radio Folders How Does Kinko's Play in the Author and Publishing Business? EU -- Racing Toward the Past Next Step -- The Personal VPN Instructions For ifLocal Macro Head for the Hills, We Don't Need No Stinkin' Telco When Nations Voluntarily Build Their Own Coffins Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Thursday, August 15, 2002Discover Common Goals to Unite Your TeamJames Robertson finds a helpful article for team leaders on the 3M Meeting Network. The text that goes along with each bullet point is worth reading if you're responsible for building or managing any group of people.10 tips for shared purpose. Christopher M. Avery has written an article on 10 secrets to a shared purpose. This outlines some tips on how to build an effective and cohesive team: Utah CIO On The Value Of Silly PatentsI appreciate Phil Windley's view on silly patents given my recent study of same in the graphic arts. I suspect Windley is right that pursuing patent enforcement, especially of questionable methods and processes, is a costly endeavor and one that not many companies can withstand.
Of All the Stupid.... The Extortion Business ModelCory's post on bogus patents is of interest because I have just been looking into a similar situation in the graphic arts.
Utterly bogus IMBot patent threatens entire field of innovation. When venture captial dries up, "innovative" companies like ActiveBuddy look for other revenue opportunities. In ActiveBuddy's case, the new money in the door will come from intimidating other technologists who ship instant-messaging bots, a concept on which the enemies of progress at the USPTO have just granted ActiveBuddy a patent. IM bots are an idea with well-known, invalidating prior art going back to well before the ActiveBuddy patent was filed. ActiveBuddy demonstrates its ignorance thus:"I am fairly confident, there were no interactive agents on IM at that point when the application was filed (August 22, 2000). I'm certainly not aware of any," said Kay, who doubles as ActiveBuddy's chief technology officer. [...](via /.)[Boing Boing Blog] ImageX, of Kirkland, WA, fits Cory's description above quite well. Launched during the Dot Com bubble, the company has struggled since inception to find success with its e-procurement and e-commerce model, which it describes as follows: ImageX (NASDAQ: IMGX) is a leading provider of Web-based services to streamline the management, production and distribution of business communication materials. But now ImageX has a new plan -- they have applied for patents on close to 60 (some estimates are as high as 90) processes and methods for producing print materials. Three patents have been granted and, at last count, they have received a sixth Notice of Allowance. The problem is these patents appear to be, at best, questionable -- covering ideas and methods which seem to be common and routine rather than any significant new technology or development. The business plan appears to be to get as many of these issues through the USPTO as possible, offer a handful of small firms extremely favorable license terms to establish commercial value, and then wage a legal battle against major players. What this means for industry innovators is unclear, but when a company receives patents for seemingly basic processing of routine operations, it does not bode well for innovators. This could adversely affect any company trying to raise efficiency through automation. More importantly, it raises the spectre of greatly increased burdens to fight legal battles over infringement. It is not clear from reading the ImageX patent data that they actually invented much of anything. Certainly nothing to justify the following claim, which openly states the company's new view of where its money will come from: [...]"These two patents illustrate the uniqueness of our technology and our production process," said Rich Begert, president and CEO. "They are at the core of our patent portfolio, and with three remaining Notices of Allowance and 47 print-related patents pending, we expect to start monetizing our patent portfolio." [WhatTheyThink?] As someone who specializes in process automation for the print industry (not patent law) I have to say this approach to business worries me, but I can't state it any more effectively than Cory: [...]When you file a patent, you aver that you have disclosed all the potentially invalidating prior art you know about. I wonder if there's a basis for pursuing a fraud claim against the inventors whose names are on the patent, since it's hardly credible that they didn't know about all this invalidating prior art before they told the federal government that they'd never heard of any of these well-known technologies.[...] [Boing Boing Blog] The USPTO does not seem competent to review patent applications in the graphic arts, despite the fact that is their job and there is no other agency so defined. But once these patents are on the books -- no matter how frivilous or unwarranted -- it is almost impossible to invalidate them. So this is an important issue for an industry that desperately needs to remain free to innovate. ImageX' new revenue strategy may well be intimidation of big industry players for royalities. If so, it seems a risky bet for all concerned. But I would certainly like to see someone at a major industry provider -- with suitable legal resources -- take a thorough look at this before unwarranted patents get on the books. Does Walmart Buy American?Walmart has been ordered to pay $464,000 in interest and lawyers fees for importing some wireless, rotating spotlights from Hong Kong. Several years ago Walmart was a big supporter of "Buy American". What happened?Judge orders Wal-Mart to pay in patent dispute. Personal VPN RecommendationsI've received two suggestions on my personal VPN query.Personal VPN's without Windows.[Curiouser and curiouser!] This looks like a good solution as long as you don't need (want?) wireless access -- especially since the LinkSys is only $120 at BestBuy. It looks like this unit does everything you need to manage a personal VPN. But I just purchased the D-Link DI614+, with mostly the same features of the LinkSys, sans the VPN endpoint, but with a wireless acces point built in. It supports multiple IPSec or PTP passthru connections, just not a VPN endpoint. So Scott Walker recommended this: Here's how to do it in software on a single-diskette Linux box with two Ethernet cards: Either way it looks like about another hundred $$ -- whether for another router or two ethernet cards and an old 486 PC. I'm inclined to go the Linux route and put it just behind my router, but first I have to learn enough about Linux to do it (or con someone into doing it for me.) Detail on Directory Browsing and File RenderingNotes on blocking /gems folder browsing and on rendering text files.Follow-up to Directory Browsing with Radio. Wednesday, August 14, 2002Klogging RolesPhil Wolff categorizing the skills needed to start and maintain a klog effort. His last point, klogging/blogging can improve your marketability, may be the most important in this time of economic stress. Those who put what they know front and center, in a way that is valuable and helpful to the audience, have taken a good first step to positively differentiating themselves from the crowd.But this changes the nature of the blog -- certainly between personal and professional blogs. I'm not sure yet just how personal is enough, how much is too much, how little is too terse. Something to watch as both the medium and the users mature. Klogging Roles.. I forsee several klogging roles. BN.com Faced With NASDAQ DelistingInteresting note, but I'm not sure it's a meaningful event. BN bookstores aren't going anywhere, and the corporate parent certainly isn't in any danger. They have one of the most smoothly integrated clicks-and-mortar operations anywhere, and their e-commerce is a much a part of the overall business as the retail stores.Bertelsmann's newfound love of traditional media could open the door for selling back their share in BN.com. That would open the door for Barnes & Noble corporate to sweep the young dot.com back into the fold.
Online bookseller faces Nasdaq exit. BBC Aug 14 2002 5:26PM ET [Moreover - Book publishing news] Entrepreneurs Need to Know the New PRIf you're starting, growing, or running a business you need to read Udell's comments on PR in the age of blogs. If you're a PR firm you definitely shoould read them. Clearly, not all (even most) journalists are as blog savvy as Udell, but most in the tech industry soon will be, or they'll be writing about something else.
Contacting me: High-tech PR in the age of blogs. In June I met Mark O'Neill, CTO of Vordel, at the Web Services Edge conference. Today Mark sent me a pointer to his new blog. As you can see by glancing at my channelroll, I've subscribed to Mark's blog. [...] Udell describes several interesting scenarios, but one of the most compelling is how simple the company/journalist contact becomes once the blog is introduced. [...] The RIAA Wouldn't LieCD sales are down and it's all due to wretched hordes of music-stealing, file-sharing, copyright-evading, computer users who don't even have the decency to watch the commercials on TV ... or not.
CD slump, piracy link rebutted. Protecting Radio FoldersA simple Meta tag to keep prying eyes from browsing weblog folders you don't want people to see.Prevent Directory Browsing in Radio. How Does Kinko's Play in the Author and Publishing Business?HarperBusiness Leadership in the 21st Century video forum pairs authors with Kinko's/Sprint to promote books.
Sprint and Kinkos Connect Top Authors With Audiences Across The Nation EU -- Racing Toward the PastHow far back do you want to go today? EU now limits linking, P2P, and soon will likely have some stupid law banning VoIP/IM to protect their telcos. This is great. In another 10 years we won't have anyone to compete against globally but ourselves. The only surprise here is why the French aren't hatching these dumb ideas first.BT Broadband accuses P2P users of copyright abuse. EU Copyright Directive to spawn wider bans? [The Register] Next Step -- The Personal VPNI'm off into another area I don't know anything about -- VPNs. Now that I have Remote Access working for Radio I want to take the next step -- establishing a personal VPN for connection to my home network when I'm away. Several questions:
Instructions For ifLocal MacroThanks Paul, I needed that. See this for background.Blunt Force Trauma: Managing Local and Remote URLs in Radio. "I don't know anything about writing macros for Frontier so how would I create an ifLocal macro? For my reference mainly, as I don't fully understand the fix but I most definitely understand the problem -- it's bitten me a couple of times already." Shouldn't be difficult. Code of the macros was posted already:
Head for the Hills, We Don't Need No Stinkin' TelcoSomething to keep in mind when I move to my bunker in the mountains. Maybe I don't have to worry about whether or not the telcos serve my remote outpost anymore if I can get a few like-minded neighbors together. I already have a friend in Dallas who's spent the last five years doing high-speed spread-spectrum wireless for commercial networks. He says it isn't that hard or that expensive. Throw in a little Wi-Fi and who knows...Do It Yourself DSL. Tuesday, August 13, 2002When Nations Voluntarily Build Their Own CoffinsI read this Register article and it says, basically, we now have the Germans, the Danes, and the EU Database Directive all working cohesively to make Europe into the technological and economic backwater of the 21st century.I don't know what the chances are of this sort of thing getting to the States. So far the stupidity is limited to Europe, and it truly is just one more step on their path to economic irrelevancy in our lifetime. At this rate they won't have anything to sell but old castles and pretty vistas by the time I retire. Deep Linking - Another article on deep linking, another heavy sigh. Somebody call a timeout. And motion for Congress to send some eager beaver who likes to create new laws. Say, Berman, get over here. You want to introduce some Internet legislation? Okay, here's what you do. Introduce a bill that says the law doesn't recognize any cause of action based on someone linking to another person's site (after all that's what the Web was created to allow). But this law isn't there to protect people from their own stupidity, so if people want to use technical means to frustrate deep linking then they're allowed to do that. Now that would be a law that makes sense. So what are the odds of that getting passed? [Ernie the Attorney] |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|