| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecently
Economic Sledgehammer
Reverse Engineering is Illegal via DMCA DOA -- Freedom to Tinker Protecting Your Identity Replacing the Wired Infrastructure Retro -- The Good Ole Days NYC -- Privacy and Common Sense Babylon 5 RIAA -- Guardian of Universities and Higher Education Farscape Reruns Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Thursday, April 10, 2003Economic SledgehammerAs an addendum to the previous post, direct reverse engineering has always been illegal, and the DMCA hasn't changed that. The engineers who developed the x86 clones went to great lengths to do so in clean environments and to avoid any contamination that could be construed as misappropriation of trade secrets or theft. They did this as a direct result of laws that were already on the books exacting severe penalties for such behavior. We did not need the DMCA to protect companies from theft by direct reverse engineering.DMCA extends these severe criminal penalties to the acts of merely discussing such things, investigating them via legitimate research, and engaging in almost any activity that the copyright holder deems to expose his "intellectual property" regardless of whether it causes actual harm or not. Thankfully, the courts have yet to uphold a conviction where no harm has been found and there are those in the legal community who claim this as evidence the DMCA is acceptable and functional law. These "unbiased" advocates of the DMCA blithely overlook the effects of economic penalty imposed on defendants when a law is structured, as the DMCA, to make them guilty until proven innocent. It is the economic sledgehammer aspect of the DMCA that is most damaging to users and individuals, for it prevents innovation by stifling the willingness to speak, act, or promote any function that may draw a copyright holder's ire. Reverse Engineering is Illegal via DMCAAccording to this InfoWorld article U.S. District Court Judge Richard Stearns has thrown out a preemptive lawsuit that would have protected the reverse engineering research of Benjamin Edelman, a student fellow at Harvard Law School's Berkman Center for Internet & Society. Nothing new here, nothing unexpected. But I have to ask -- just where would we be if all those engineers who founded AMD, Cyrix, Cypress, and others had been imprisoned or driven to bankruptcy for reverse engineering the x86 architecture?Would the PC revolution have spread so far, so fast? The last time I looked Intel had a $100+ billion market capitalization, $26 billion in net revenues, and $3+ billion in net income. They certainly don't seem to have suffered from competitive reverse engineering. Certainly, they had to work harder to stay ahead, but that's what capitalism and competition is about. It is not about buying off lawmakers to put your competition in jail. Had the DMCA been in effect 20 years ago there would be no PC revolution, and the losers would have been the users, buyers, and individuals -- the same groups being damaged today by the DMCA.
Judge dismisses DMCA challenge. Reverse-engineering not protected [InfoWorld: Top News] DOA -- Freedom to TinkerNot to be confused with Freedom to Tinker the weblog, our real freedom to tinker is being destroyed by the Copyright Cabal and their monetary hold on the political and judicial systems. I wrote about this XBox controversy, and the potential damage it could do, a couple of months ago. I have no doubt that this prediction in the Register article will come true:
[...] However, one thing is certain; the sentence will send an extremely powerful message to anyone else involved in the production or sale of Xbox mod chips in the USA (so far, the attempts of the US Department of Justice to extend the reach of the DMCA beyond its borders have - thankfully - been a failure). Expect a lot of mod chip projects and websites to quietly disappear in the next few days. [The Register] Wherever one may stand on the issue of applying property rights to technology, it is difficult to argue in favor of laws that strip all property rights away from the legal purchasers of equipment. That's what the DMCA does. I have also noticed since my earlier post that aftermarket manufacturers in several large industries -- including printers and automotive -- are rightfully scared of a full-scale onslaught that will come from manufacturers now that there is a precedent for establishing a legal monopoly in virtually any industry by simply invoking the DMCA. The DMCA is very bad law -- not a good law that can be misused, but a law that has almost no legitimate use that wasn't already provided by existing laws. Its sole purpose was to establish a draconian environment managed by copyright holders to the direct detriment of users, buyers, and individuals.
Electrical engineering is a crime. Not that we need more proof of the overreaching nature of the DMCA, but there it is. So David Rocci produces and sells "mod" chips for the XBox and gets five months in prison, five months of home detention and a $28,500 fine. Sure, that makes sense, particularly when compared to violent criminals who receive lesser sentences. [algorhythm] Protecting Your IdentityHere are some good tips for protecting your privacy in both the virtual and physical worlds. I'm pretty cautious about these things but there are a couple of ideas here I hadn't considered, so I figured this list was worth mentioning. I've reposted it in its entirety from Phil's weblog.
Tips for Protecting Your Identity. Replacing the Wired InfrastructureVery encouraging announcement from the WiMAX group. With recent FCC decisions supporting monopoly broadcaster and telco privileges at the expense of consumer rights and technology advancements it's difficult to stay upbeat about the future of the Internet and connectivity in general. But this ComputerWorld article provides some hope in the form of technology developments and technical direction from major producers of wide-area wireless equipment for the 802.16 standard.It looks like WiMAX could provide viable, affordable wide-area wireless backbone connectivity within a couple of years. Though the telco and cable monopolies will put everything they have into preventing, co-opting, or slowing the spread of this technology, it is our only real hope for getting to the affordable 2-way Internet connectivity we need. The day I can dump my relationship with brain-damaged companies like BellSouth and Sprint and get all my connectivity through EarthLink will be a great day indeed. With luck the WiMAX stuff will get deployed before the FCC mandates let BellSouth toss EarthLink out of their copper network and I have to start paying triple prices for 1/3 the service.
Dropping MAN Pricing. Customer equipment for wireless broadband could drop to $30 in a few years with 802.16: Good insight on the WiMAX announcement by Intel, Nokia, Proxim, Alvarion, and others to form an interoperable standard around 802.16a. The interoperability reduces the cost of developing and proving proprietary extensions. Uses of 802.16a will include T-1 replacement and backhaul service to hot spots. [Wi-Fi Networking News] Saturday, April 5, 2003Retro -- The Good Ole DaysI remember once finding a cache of cir.1960 Playboy magazines at a place I worked. I was much younger but even then I thought they were wonderful. No, not for the articles. For the art. It was classic stuff, combining sensuality and femininity with a touch of naughty humor that's a far cry from the harsh biology which innudates us today. I wish I'd kept them.But thanks to Patrick I found the retro art of Gil Elvgren. Gil did a wonderful job of capturing the innocence of a time that seems so long ago. When did we lose our taste for nuance, euphemism, and imagination?
This is probably old news,. NYC -- Privacy and Common SenseDan Gillmor reports on an unnerving episode at a Manhattan hotel, and since I'm headed there tomorrow it caught my attention. It's hard to balance legitimate security needs and personal freedom and I'm not sure there is a perfect answer. But I am quite sure we've swung way over the line, with a power-mongering police state chomping at the bit to demonstrate just how grand their "protection" efforts are.
Driver's license? Oops. Sorry. I forgot it.
privacy in hotel. Friday, April 4, 2003Babylon 5Great lines from science fiction characters:"What do you want, you moon-faced assassin of joy?!" -- Ambassador Londo Mollari to his assistant Vir, when interrupted during a session with a Centauri concubine (or one of his wives). Babylon 5
RIAA -- Guardian of Universities and Higher EducationI feel so much better now. That bastion of decency, that benchmark of balance, that defender of the rights of the abused and oppressed, the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) has filed a lawsuit to protect the networks of our universities from the dreadful scourge of students who run P2P networks.According to this press release, the University networks have been usurped by hardened criminals flouting the rights of artists worldwide and dragging network performance down to the point that simple e-mail is no longer available to poor, honest students. This is a travesty! A travesty, I say! As the trade group representing America's only legalized extortion racket, no one is better suited than the RIAA to recognize evil doers, or to bring them to justice. Thank God they are on the case. I will sleep better tonight.
[...] Because of the sophistication of the technology and the expertise needed to install and manage such systems, Napster network operators can't help but be aware of the copyright infringement they facilitate. Indeed, each of the accused operators has seeded his services with hundreds -- and in some cases, thousands -- of copyrighted works. And in fact, they often monitor the infringement and, in several instances, have publicly bragged about it. Farscape RerunsSciFi seems to have begun showing the first season of Farscape again, running each night at midnight EST. Don't know how long they'll run it, but at least I can catch up on some of the earlier episodes I missed. |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|