| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecently
Weblogs and Threaded Messaging
Microsoft to Cease Internet Explorer for Macintosh FCC Says No to Independent Producers Islam Unveiled MozillaFirebird 0.6 - What Happened Here? OneSuite.com Long Distance for 2.5 cents/min 123teleconference.com Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Monday, June 16, 2003Weblogs and Threaded MessagingDiscussion on the future of weblog comments, the migration to discussion forums, and the merger between the two. Issues to consider:
Isn't all this really just moving right back to basic threaded message forums -- with the added ability of highlighting a post, binding it to its own URL, grouping it with other highlighted posts on a web page, and displaying them in reverse chronological order? (BTW, a complete implementation of this mechanism already exists in the Conversant groupware platform.) Isn't the locus of conversation going right back to threaded messages? Are weblogs now little more than HTML advertisements for discussion groups? Maybe that's what they've been all along, but it seems like we took an awfully circuitous path to get here. And what of the cultural and personal barriers that exist for many people when it comes to speaking in a competitive environment. Make no mistake -- public discussion forums are comptetitive. Is that what we want from weblogs? What of privacy? Many discussions can, and should, occur within private communities. But often one or more of the emerging ideas needs to go public. Can those ideas be made public without a wholesale rebuilding of the discussion? Below, George Siemens and Jim McGee emphasize the need for active reflection in order to fully absorb, understand, and learn.
Active reflection, managed learning, and organizational changeOrganizational learning. Dumping everything into a publicly indexed, unrestricted message forum does not necessarily promote active reflection, or provide an opportunity to learn it. Weblogs were interesting because they limited the amount of feedback -- people had to be very motivated to institute a conversation on a weblog. Lowering that barrier might be a good thing, but it might also take away the insulative quality that allows participation by some who would never speak up in a forum. The need for a private-public interchange point -- or some structured release mechanism where messages can be gradually be released to broader and broader audiences by using the same tools/systems -- might also be significant. Active reflection requires a sense of safety, and safety is the last thing one gets from public forums. Saturday, June 14, 2003Microsoft to Cease Internet Explorer for MacintoshThis announcement from Microsoft via WSJ Online (subscription required) regarding:
Microsoft to Cease Making Versions Of Explorer Browser for Macintosh FCC Says No to Independent ProducersThere is something profoundly disturbing about the following phrase from FCC Rebuffs Bid by Producers On Independent TV Programs via WSJ Online (subscription required):
[...] As gatekeepers to the airwaves, the FCC said, the networks decide what goes on the air no matter who produces it. [...] Whether or not the http://www.fcc.gov/">FCC ruling on requiring source-diversity in programming would have benefited the public or not is moot. What is important, at least to me, is the idea that the FCC has apparently decided that four commercial entities are rightly and justly entitled to act as "gatekeepers to the airwaves". This is absurd. Ludicrous. Breathtakingly stupid at a scale rarely seen in human history. Gateway to the airwaves? The public airwaves? The radio spectrum that nature provided to all mankind? The FCC thinks that spectrum belongs -- lock, stock, and barrel -- to the four television networks?! Who the hell is in charge up there?! How can they say that with a straight face? I feel like I'm back in the 1890's when John D. Rockefeller was running rampant over an ignorant populace of laborers. Islam UnveiledI am about one-third of the way through Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions about the World's Fastest-Growing Faith, by Robert Spencer.The book is both enlightening in its detail and frightening in its implications. It has made explicit things which I suspected but had never bothered to study. I did not grasp the magnitude of the cultural battle that is brewing. It really is an East vs. West global conflict, and among my friends, family, and associates only the military historians actually seem to understand the full scope of the problem and what is at stake. This book has just gone onto my gift list for friends and family. Anyone looking to understand what is in store for the next 30 years should take the time to read this book. Its exploration of Islamic culture exposes a fascinating problem and a potentially disastrous future. Friday, June 13, 2003MozillaFirebird 0.6 - What Happened Here?I ran Mozilla phoenix 0.5 for quite some time as a secondary browser. It worked pretty well. Well enough that I actually ran it as my primary browser for a month or so after Opera released the gawdawful v.7.0. But then Opera released 7.11 (which should have been the first release) to fix most of the major fubars and it was better for most things. I still kept phoenix 0.5 loaded because it displayed some pages more accurately than Opera, and for compatibility testing.But now I've upgraded to the Firebird 0.6 release. What a crapper. Isn't there a sort of progression that's supposed to happen here, like each version gets a little better than the last, not worse? Maybe that's just my unenlightened view. In any case, getting Firebird to run is a pain, and the prefs screen that allows you to set all the default applications has disappeared. What?! I can set Firebird as the default but Radio can't find it on start-up, and neither can anything else. And there is apparently no way to make it the default app for opening jpg files, xml files, or anything else (save worming my way through some Windoze file preference.) Beta software. Ugh. OneSuite.com Long Distance for 2.5 cents/minWhile on the subject of office services -- I've been using a dial-around long distance service called OneSuite.com for the past several months. OneSuite offers domestic long distance rates of 2.5/2.9 cents per minute.Dial-around means that I have to dial an access number before placing my call. If I use a local access number the rate is 2.5 cents. If I use the OneSuite 800 number it's 2.9 cents -- still a good deal. Dial-around services can be a hassle, but OneSuite has features that minimize the hassle and add some things I like. First, all the account management is handled on-line via credit card. They claim to have 24-hour live customer service but I've never had any trouble with the on-line setup or account management features and have never tried it. The system is pre-pay via credit card -- in other words, I buy a certain number of minutes in advance. I can buy as little as $5, or as much as $100. But by prepaying there is no chance that I can get stuck with some enormous long distance bill. I like that. When I started I bought $5 at a time. I have confidence in the service now and usually buy $20. That lasts me 4-6 weeks, and I call long distance all the time. The company also offers some pretty good international rates for certain countries. Other features include:
The only downside is that I occasionally get poor line quality. I'd say about 1 in 10 calls have some sort of echo, static, or other irritating acoustic anomaly. Usually I just call back and it clears up. Sometimes it doesn't. It doesn't happen often enough to be a real problem considering I'm saving 50%-70% off my long distance bill each month. But it can still be irritating. OneSuite.com. Recommended. 123teleconference.comI just completed my first teleconference with 123teleconference.com. It seems to be a professional organization. I signed up for a credit-card account on-line. Within an hour a representative of the company called me to go over the account, answer any questions, and be sure I knew what to do.With the service I get a permanent 800 dial-in number, ad hoc access (no need to call and schedule a conference in advance), simple procedures, basic features (like mute for people on cell phones), and a rate of 9.9 cents per caller per minute. I used the service for the first time this morning -- holding a three-way call with the pseudo project team for my Conversant intranet development. The service worked great -- excellent call quality, no problems getting in or out, and I had a confirmed invoice delivered via e-mail within minutes of completing the call. This is the way outsourced office services should be -- convenient, quick, hassle-free. 123teleconference.com. Highly recommended. |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|