| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecently
Weblog Post Index
Orrin Hatch - Four-Part Harmony Physiological Effects of Display Monitors SCO Claim Against IBM's AIX Weblogs and Threaded Messaging Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Wednesday, June 18, 2003Weblog Post IndexWow! This is super handy. Clean, simple, straightforward. There is now a complete index of all posts to this weblog since it's inception. I can stop manually updating my archives. Woo Hoo!
Creating an index of weblog posts in Radio Orrin Hatch -Senator Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, is Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. I haven't checked the Congressional Record, but it appears the alleged remarks were made during a Senate hearing on copyright. (Senators routinely amend their remarks in the CR anyway.)
Orrin Hatch: clueless and malevolent. "'If we can find some way to [stop file sharing] without destroying their machines, we'd be interested in hearing about that,' Hatch said. 'If that's the only way, then I'm all for destroying their machines. If you have a few hundred thousand of those, I think people would realize' the seriousness of their actions, he said." [WashingtonPost.com] [viaalgorhythm] This kind of outburst is what we expect from junior Congressmen who don't know any better. But it is not something that should come from the mouth of a ranking official in our government. This is pretty close to the stupidity publicly demonstrated by Trent Lott (racist laws) and Howard Coble (Japanese internment). Let's hope this gets lots of exposure and generates some serious feedback to those moral compasses inhabiting Congress. This issue no longer affects a few kids. What Hatch is supporting is wholesale, unrestricted vigilantism against private, ordinary citizens by a tiny handful of mega-corporations. Remember that when you go to the polls. Tuesday, June 17, 2003Four-Part HarmonyStraight from the horse's mouth.Tip: Click on the horse. Physiological Effects of Display MonitorsA very small-scale Japanese study, published in the May 2003 issue of American Journal of Physiology, reports that nighttime use of a bright display terminal causes physiological changes in the body which contribute to insomnia. Among the reported effects were:
Though small, this study supports the general conclusion of physiological variations between viewing on screen and in print. As noted previously, brain wave studies reported by Dr. Robert Restak indicate important differences in brain activity between digital and physical viewing. This particular study focused on the effects of bright monitors and "exciting" activity such as gaming, but such findings could eventually provide a scientific basis for determining the best method of delivering certain types of information. SCO Claim Against IBM's AIXThe latest skirmish between SCO and IBM, reported via c/net News, is a real doozy. The SCO representative, Chris Sontag, is looking more and more like the Iraqi Minister of Public Information every day:
"We have terminated IBM's right to use AIX in their business, development, distribution and sales," said Chris Sontag, head of the SCOsource effort to derive more revenue from the company's Unix intellectual property. And in an amendment to the company's March complaint against IBM, SCO is "seeking a permanent injunction from IBM's continued use of our software in their business." This sounds like something from the RIAA, or the WW<strike>F</strike>E. No sane person is going to open a can of whoopass on a 2,000 lb gorilla's favorite possession. Tora! Tora! Tora! Die with honor! This is a company begging for death; taunting its executioner; longing to become part of some attorney's retirement fund. This is almost as entertaining as watching Al Sharpton run for Congress. Monday, June 16, 2003Weblogs and Threaded MessagingDiscussion on the future of weblog comments, the migration to discussion forums, and the merger between the two. Issues to consider:
Isn't all this really just moving right back to basic threaded message forums -- with the added ability of highlighting a post, binding it to its own URL, grouping it with other highlighted posts on a web page, and displaying them in reverse chronological order? (BTW, a complete implementation of this mechanism already exists in the Conversant groupware platform.) Isn't the locus of conversation going right back to threaded messages? Are weblogs now little more than HTML advertisements for discussion groups? Maybe that's what they've been all along, but it seems like we took an awfully circuitous path to get here. And what of the cultural and personal barriers that exist for many people when it comes to speaking in a competitive environment. Make no mistake -- public discussion forums are comptetitive. Is that what we want from weblogs? What of privacy? Many discussions can, and should, occur within private communities. But often one or more of the emerging ideas needs to go public. Can those ideas be made public without a wholesale rebuilding of the discussion? Below, George Siemens and Jim McGee emphasize the need for active reflection in order to fully absorb, understand, and learn.
Active reflection, managed learning, and organizational changeOrganizational learning. Dumping everything into a publicly indexed, unrestricted message forum does not necessarily promote active reflection, or provide an opportunity to learn it. Weblogs were interesting because they limited the amount of feedback -- people had to be very motivated to institute a conversation on a weblog. Lowering that barrier might be a good thing, but it might also take away the insulative quality that allows participation by some who would never speak up in a forum. The need for a private-public interchange point -- or some structured release mechanism where messages can be gradually be released to broader and broader audiences by using the same tools/systems -- might also be significant. Active reflection requires a sense of safety, and safety is the last thing one gets from public forums. |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|