| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecently
RIAA Anti-Trust Settlement Approved
Homeland Security - Not Just For Terrorists Anymore Five Key Questions About Business Blogs Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Sunday, July 13, 2003RIAA Anti-Trust Settlement ApprovedThe anti-trust settlement against the RIAA was finally approved last week. Refund claims are now being processed. Don't forget to endorse your check over to the EFF and send it to them. Let the RIAA know their money is being used for a good cause.Thursday, July 10, 2003Homeland Security - Not Just For Terrorists AnymoreThe rise of the American Police State continues as the Department of Homeland Security searches out new menaces, new threats, and new causes to justify its existence, its budget, and its ever-increasing intrusions into our lives.Like every good Government program, the first line of growth is "TO SAVE THE CHILDREN" -- the all-purpose wooing call for the simple-minded. People will blindly agree to the stupidest, most egregious laws and programs if you tell them it will SAVE JUST ONE CHILD. In the last 20 years SAVING THE CHILDREN has become the blanket justification for any and every imaginable usurpation of liberty, coercion, and boondoggled bureaucracy. Got an idea that no rational person would support? Tell 'em it's FOR THE CHILDREN and you'll have no trouble at all. Really, what cold-hearted bastard could be against any program that could save a child from the clutches of a predator? Of course, we don't want to put any responsibility on parents to actually watch their children, exercise due diligence in securing care for them, or maybe even (God forbid) not give them open access to the Internet. Why, some of those things might make it seem like we really didn't need the most massive government agency in history to snoop in every facet of our lives and then, well, what *would* we do? Child pornography is despicable, predatory, and malicious. But it is not terrorism. It is not the domain of DHS, and it is not justification for throwing away the liberties of millions of Americans while hiding behind the American flag and distorting the meaning of patriotism in a way even the Nazis would envy.
WASHINGTON -- The Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday launched an operation to help protect children from pornographers, child prostitution rings, Internet predators and human traffickers. Maybe you're like my Mom, and you think I'm just a little bit wigged-out over all this American mullah/DHS/John Ashcroft/police-state business. Maybe you think we can trust these folks because they're the GOOD GUYS, or because they have our best interests at heart, or just because you don't know any better. You should read Cringely's tale of CALEA. It's a disturbing expose' on how those who are supposed to protect us already abuse and misuse the tools they have, quite possibly creating a greater threat than they were supposed to solve at the outset. I'm not suggesting that we don't need law enforcement, or that they don't need modern tools. Certainly we do, and certainly Islamic Jihadists pose a threat worth watching. But *we* need to be watching the watchers, with more scrutiny than they can stand. For only then will we know for sure who the GOOD GUYS are. We should send copies of Cringely's article to our government representatives, mayor, and local newspapers and see if anyone knows anything about CALEA. Because only when know the secret uses and abuses of the watchers will we be able to protect our own liberties as law-abiding citizens of a free Republic. Tuesday, July 8, 2003Five Key Questions About Business BlogsE-mail marketing outfit MarketingProfs.com has published an article on business blogging geared to the e-mail marketer. Little new here to those who are well-versed in the blogoshpere, but it is an interesting look into the minds of those who have, until now, relied on e-newsletters and other e-communications as their primary communications vehicles.
[...] Put it this way: scarcely 10 years ago you might have asked, Will email replace the phone, fax and postal mail as the preferred means of business communication? Of course, we exclaim in hindsight. |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|