| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecently
WebDrive
Tools to Get Things Done BlogDoc 1.0 -- The Case for Iterative Blogging FeedDemon and RSS Enclosures Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Wednesday, November 17, 2004WebDriveWhile I'm thinking about tools... I've been meaning to blog this for a while. WebDrive is the most kickass FTP client for Windoze I've ever used. I've used a number of FTP clients (WS FTP, CuteFTP, CoffeeCup FTP, etc.) I've also done the manly-geek thing of logging in via SSH and executing some robust remove -r and .htaccess commands. But WebDrive lets me treat an FTP volume just like a local drive, with all the access that entails. I can add/remove folders (including all contents), drag-n-drop files, etc. Very nice. And worth paying for. $59.95 from South River Technologies.
Posted by:
Categories: Productivity, Technology Tools to Get Things DoneIf you're a fan of David Allen's "Getting Things Done" (GTD) methodology for personal productivity management, Trader Mike has found a nice set of notes on David's latest seminar in Bah-stun:
GTD is a little metaphysical - too much so for some people - but it's gaining a tremendous following. It's not your father's Todo list. I've seen GTD described thusly, "It's not time management, but rather managing yourself in time." That's a good summary. I have both the book and the Audible audio version. (Oddly, it seems impossible to link directly to the summary page for an Audible title if you aren't a member. Hmmm.)
Thursday, November 4, 2004BlogDoc 1.0 -- The Case for Iterative BloggingIn Iterative Blogging: BlogDoc 1.0 Stuart Henshall describes a collaborative scenario much like the one I began working on a little over a year ago -- a simple, structured way to support group iteration of documents, keeping all team members apprised of updates, new versions, and progress but without inundating them with mass, round-robin e-mail attachments. What I envisioned was some combination of the functions of forums, weblogs, doc mgmt, and possibly wikis. Here's the scenario Stuart described:
In the past year I've completed four document-centric projects with Fortune 100 companies. Circulating drafts and iterating documents was a key process in each, yet the experience was almost universally painful. I'm convinced there is a better, easier way that users will embrace. Weblogs and RSS with enclosures can play a role in this, but they are only part of the solution. I spent a good deal of mental energy thinking about the above scenario last year and came up with my own list of requirements, but it's longer, messier, and differs somewhat from Stuart's. So I'll quote his and then comment below:
This is a good list and I agree with most of the detail points, but in my experience the typical person in a knowledge job will not readily adopt either blogs or wikis for document creation, so the blog/wiki/forum is not the right tool in which to initiate the document. Also, when the content is complete it will likely go back into some formalized container -- a Word doc, spreadsheet, etc. -- and scattering content through a blog/wiki further inconveniences the user. Finally, not all the content is necessarily text -- it may be graphics, photos, animation, audio, or video -- and may not fit well into the text-centric nature of the blog/wiki. So what is needed is some form of lightweight document mgmt function that can track native files and extract common types of text, combined with some automation that can post excerpts and updates to the blog/forum/wiki where users can edit and comment. RSS can be used for notifications and distribution of new versions and updates, and lightweight calendaring can send out reminders and due dates (which can also go out via RSS.) For best user uptake, everything that goes out via RSS should also be available via e-mail, at the user's option. There are four goals for such a system:
Every other objective is subservient to these goals, because if the user doesn't embrace the system, feel immediately comfortable, find it convenient, and save time there is no way to gain any of the other advantages. The barriers to entry have to be low, and impact on users' time has to be positive, not negative. That means the system can't be radically different from what they use today, can't force them immediately into new habits, can't assault them with a lot of change. Rather, it must slip under their "resistance radar" with some immediate improvement to their lives before it earns the right to demonstrate the other value and benefits that management feels it's paying for:
Ultimately, we would hope the benefits of simple group editing, bloggable updates, understandable audit trails, and automated distribution would spread like Kudzu (a prolific nuisance weed in the South) across the organization, leading to increased use of the tools for all manner of projects. But it's the initial hurdle that stymies most efforts today, as the systems are too geeky, too complex, or just too "different" for people to get enthusiastic about them. So they continue to work in silos, e-mailing massive numbers of documents around the world with "Reply-to All" until eventually everyone has dozens of versions and most of them lose track. I cannot tell you the time I've wasted on conference calls in the past year as various team members tried to find the right version, discussed which e-mail contained the last version, or asked someone to "just shoot me another copy to be sure I have the right one." Last year I settled on Conversant, the platform upon which this weblog runs, as the most promising tool set to deliver this functionality. To the extent that future improvements in blog/wiki technology provide better connections to common document and presentation tools, or more structured formatting and output via PDF, some of my concerns with them may be alleviated. (I know of a couple of wiki-based solutions being developed around these premises.) But Conversant is the only tool I'm aware of today that even comes close to meeting the requirements (outside the major enterprise players.) Even Conversant doesn't have all the tools in its default configuration, but it does has a document management module that integrates with the blogging/messaging/event calendar structure to provide the majority of what's needed. Over the next few weeks I'll be looking at that document management function with Conversant's developer Seth Dillingham to see how well it handles the requirements and improves the iterative process. Conversant also lacks any free-form text or wiki component, so I'll be looking to integrate a nice third-party package in some way. I really like Stuart's idea of migrating completed documents to a wiki, where they can not only be stored openly for reference but also improved over time. Integrating one into the system should be straightforward, but it can wait. Wikis are generally just too geeky to get traction in the corporate cube farms and can be introduced later, after the system has begun to show its value. More on this as I make progress.
Posted by:
Categories: Collaboration, Productivity, Technology Monday, November 1, 2004FeedDemon and RSS EnclosuresNick Bradbury writes good software. I'm a longtime user of HomeSite, and a registered user of TopStyle. As I mentioned this morning, I'm playing with a trial copy of FeedDemon (in concert with BlogJet.) The combo is pretty nice, and I really like the idea of having a newsreader that syncs with Bloglines. But Bradbury made a design decision on FeedDemon that will need to change before I can commit to it as a full-time tool:
So Nick concluded that the most viable use for enclosures was to stream audio/video files from web sites. I can understand this, but it's just not the case. Podcasting has shown one increasingly popular use for media files that aren't streamed. As for me, I'm interested in alternative ways of distributing strategic information. RSS enclosures seem like an efficient way to distribute a number of things that project or business teams might want to share. Some of it might be audio-video, but it might also be several other types of data. Aggregator support for enclosures has been really weak (except for Radio) until now. I'm hoping the growth of Podcasting will help change that. I don't know how other newsreaders are handling enclosures. I may get around to trying a few more as I have time. And I plan to get Radio re-installed in a few weeks to see how it works as a client for my current blogging platform. If you have suggestions or ideas on other RSS readers feel free to leave me a comment.
Posted by:
Categories: Technology, Productivity |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|