Most Popular


Book Reviews

The Ultimate Guide to Electronic Marketing for Small Business
The Daily Drucker
Copy This! The Story of Kinko's
Presence: An Exploration of Profound Change in People, Organizations, and Society
How To Read A Book
Contempt: How the Right is Wronging American Justice
Classical Education at Home
Copy Fights: The Future of Intellectual Property In The Information Age
Flawless Consulting: How to Get Your Expertise Used

Recently


Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting

Saturday, September 10, 2005

terrywfrazier@gmail.com

I have added a gmail and google talk account to my ever-growing list internet communications addresses (I think it's up to a dozen now.) The number of comm points is getting silly. Thank goodness for Trillian, the all-in-one chat client for Windoze. Otherwise managing all these things would be even more difficult than it is.

I've had a jabber account for a year or so, terrywfrazier@jabber.org, but the public Jabber network has never achieved the reach or stability that the bigger services like AIM and Y! have. I hope google talk will bring both. We'll see.
Posted by: Send an e-mail to Terry Frazier Terry Frazier at 8:22 PM  | Permanent Link  | Trackback URL | 
Categories: Collaboration, Productivity, Technology


Thursday, August 25, 2005

Three Keys to Motivating Personal Change

Knowledge Jolt author Jack Vinson captures three keys to driving change in personal behaviors:

One motivation to rule them all

Is there a core problem that explains all of these behaviors? What motivates me to do anything? Conviction that it is important to me. At the same time, I need to see a path to change, and have some confidence that the path is going to lead me the right way while not creating any additional problems (or that I can overcome obstacles). But without that critical conviction, I am not going to be interested in making the effort to change.

Vinson’s observation comes while considering Dave Pollard’s Nine reasons we don't do what we should do, an excellent summary of tendencies, traits, and trends explaining why we never seem to accomplish as much as we think we should.

I like Vinson’s three keys. They apply to all personal change, whether directed at ourselves or others. One challenge many of us face, as working professionals in knowledge-based industries, is getting our companies, colleagues, and customers to embrace the many new collaborative tools – blogs, wikis, IM, presence, etc. – that we have found so beneficial. We struggle to explain this new paradigm and toolset, but we don’t often succeed because we don’t successfully turn all three keys.

We can generate some initial motivation, because we have a critical conviction that the tools are good, right, and will help them. But we fail on the other two. Conviction is contagious, but fragile. When we don’t show a clear, simple path or don’t have a believable plan to remove or overcome obstacles our most impassioned arguments lie fallow and die.

Clearly then, the work must be done to better understand the customer or colleague’s perspective, and too supply keys that have been carved to fit their circumstances.

Posted by: Send an e-mail to Terry Frazier Terry Frazier at 4:22 PM  | Permanent Link  | Trackback URL | 
Categories: Productivity, Strategy


Friday, August 19, 2005

The Peculiar Genius of Personal Fabrication

As a follow-up to my emachineshop post a few weeks ago, there's a great article in the September issue of Wired (on your newstand now, not yet online) about mini fabrication labs popping up all over the place. These labs use the latest in affordable, computerized tools to build one-off devices and parts. Author Clive Thompson interviews eMachineShop founder Jim Lewis and uses the eMachineShop software to create his own one-off guitar to test the process. The author also discusses MIT professor Neil Gershenfeld's worldwide network of fab labs and spends some time inside Saul Griffith's California-based SquidLabs.

While the equipment isn't cheap, it's not as much as you'd think. Everything in the shops discussed in the article - vacuum formers, laser cutters, milling machines - could be bought for between $50,000 and $100,000. Further, software like eMachineShop makes using the tools possible for anyone. After each one of Gershenfeld's mini labs opened, people showed up to create an amazing array of things. Among the samples in the article:
  • A Norwegian sheepherder built GPS-enabled tags for his flock
  • An Indian businessman created and electrode-driven device to measure the fat content of milk
  • A Boston teen created a motion-detector security system for her dairy.
The real kicker here is that Moore's Law is rapidly driving down the cost, and driving up the productivity, of fabrication. Gershenfeld predicts that within a decade or so we'll be able to make almost any household part or repair with a $1,000 desktop device - the realization of the Star Trek Replicator.

The implications for this - the idea that the cost of prototyping is dropping to near zero and tools for design will be understandable and available to anyone with high school-level computer skills - are profound. Today the market is for one-offs - things no big company will make. But in the future this may well replace the R&D and design departments at many, even most, product companies. What has begun to happen to software - small, innovative (and often open source) software companies spring into existence to be quickly bought by big behemoths who can no longer innovate on their own - could well become the norm physical products. Have a better idea for a derailleur shifter on a bike? Prototype it on your own. Designed a spiffy new fuel injector nozzle to drive up fuel mileage? Crank out a few and see if they work.

There will likely never be anything as cost effective as mass production, and there will remain a need to understand materials science, engineering, etc. But today the understanding isn't enough. You need access to massive amounts of capital to test and develop new products. It's this accumulation of capital that allows big corporations to make the rules about what is saleable, profitable, and appropriate. In the future your knowledge of some basic engineering principles combined with a good idea may be all it takes to completely remake a product category. That has to be a scary idea for big corporations everywhere.
Posted by: Send an e-mail to Terry Frazier Terry Frazier at 2:22 PM  | Permanent Link  | Trackback URL | 
Categories: Productivity, Technology
Terry W. Frazier
Search this site:
Advanced Search

Syndication

Add to any service
Get updates in your e-mail!

Contact

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 
My PGP Key
My Linkedin Profile


Presence


 

 
 ICQ

 

 



 

www.flickr.com
GratefulZed's photos More of GratefulZed's photos