| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecentlyTheme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Saturday, March 5, 2005Largest Technolgy Boondoggle in Public Education HistorySuburban Atlanta school district Cobb County Public Schools is gearing up to spend $70 million with Apple Computer to equip all middle and high school students and teachers with laptops.
Oh. My. God. What a boondoggle. This is tangible, measurable, palpable proof that people in Cobb County have more money than brains. Within less than two school years the majority of those laptops will be broken and useless. The ones given to teachers will be largely unused, except for simple gradebook programs. And the students still wont know how to do basic life functions such as balance a checkbook. This is the sort of bureaucratic, politically-correct, insanity that drives me nuts. At least its not a federal program that we all have to pay for (though Im sure at least some of the funds will come from Federal coffers eventually.) Why, you may ask, does a techno-advocate like me go pale over such a grand infusion of technology? Because its being done by idiots who have no clue whats really wrong with their school system.
No, that is not what leadership is about. I have two aunts who are public school teachers in southern California. Several years ago their district squandered $5-$6 million giving every teacher in the district a Dell laptop. Everyone thought this was grand. What a great idea. Wahoo! Were a technically advanced school system. Unfortunately, they didnt bother to provide the sort of intense training required to turn a bunch of middle-aged school teachers into effective technology users, much less technologically adept teachers. As a result, the school district has several thousand very expensive Dell-brand doorstops. And nothing, absolutely nothing, got better. Cobb County is even worse. Theyre giving the laptops to kids, fer petes sake. Just how long do they think one of those beautiful G4s is gonna last in the hands of some 14-year-old? G4s are not GameBoys. They dont take to being dropped, banged, thumped, slammed, used as book props or whatever. This is so incredibly stupid I can barely imagine it. The same school officials that ban cell phones, pagers, GameBoys, etc (all of which, BTW, are computers) now wants to give the students laptops but has no idea what those laptops are really for.
Kids dont need technology training. They have computer labs in my daughters school. You know what theyre teaching her to do? PowerPoint presentations! Teaching middle schoolers applications like M$Word and powerpoint and passing it off as 21st century education ought to be punishable by a prison sentence. If youre going to teach them anything, make it Quicken. The rest theyll learn on their own given a little time to play around. Enough whining. If the school district has $70 million to squander, heres what they ought to do:
We still have $51.5 million. What are we going to do with
all that money? What about adding more Algebra or Science teachers, putting art
and music back into the curriculum, creating better after-school tutoring
programs, or any of the thousands of things the typical public school needs? Anything except squander it on a boondoggle so some bureacrat can massage his ego.
Posted by:
Categories: Learning, Policy & Regulation, Technology Thursday, February 10, 2005What's the Joke...About a car that crashes as often as Windoze? We may be getting there, literally.
NEW STUDY WARNS OF CAR VIRUSES
Posted by:
Categories: Security, Technology Thursday, January 27, 2005Adobe Acrobat 7I've just installed version 7 of Adobe Acrobat, the best-selling tool for creating Adobe's proprietary PDF (portable document format) files. PDFs have some nifty uses but most of its functions don't interest me. There are also some things I really don't like -- such as putting PDFs on the web when an HTML file will do the job just as well and with a lot less hassle. I hate clicking an unmarked URL that suddenly clogs up my browser with Acrobat (excuse me, Adobe) Reader and starts hogging memory and cpu cycles. But I digress. With Version 7 Adobe has, at long last, made a much-needed feature available to anyone with the free Adobe Reader -- commenting. This is a big deal. Sending MSWord files to clients is a terrifying experience and yet, if you're going to have clients or colleagues review a document in progress you have had little choice.
It is inconceivable to me that Microsoft thinks it's a good idea to have a word processing program with no definitive way to remove all hidden and meta data. But they've done (and continue to do) stupider things.
Having deleted or hidden data show up in a file at someone else's desktop can be embarrassing. If you work in highly political, confidential, or competitive situations the effects of such "accidents" can be devastating. Adobe has finally recognized this problem as a market opportunity. With Acrobat 7 they have made it possible to create a PDF file with commenting enabled so that anyone using Adobe Reader 7 can delete text, insert text, or simply add editorial comments. When finished the entire PDF can be sent back to the originator or, even better, the comments can be exported into a separate file. The originator can combine comment files from multiple reviewers and import them back into MSWord to form the basis of revisions. This is a substantial improvement over the old "track changes and pray" routine inherent in MSWord document reviews. Getting this capability isn't cheap. You have to buy the $400 Professional version of Acrobat to get it. But at least it's a one-time expense. Anyone using Reader 7 can then become part of the editorial review cycle. If you're in the consulting business or have to worry about sanitizing docs before they go out for review this is definitely something you want to check out.
Posted by:
Categories: Productivity, Technology |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|