| Guests: Welcome! · Sign Up · Log On | ||
b.cognoscoWhere leaping to conclusions is my primary form of forward motion. |
||
| Home · Identity · About b.cognosco · Archive Index · Book Store | ||
Most Popular
Book ReviewsRecently
Senators to Hear Testimony on Data Theft
How Widespread is Data Theft? 'Hackers' Not the Biggest Security Risk But I know this isn't it Theme Design
IT Support
Hosting
|
Thursday, March 10, 2005Senators to Hear Testimony on Data TheftAt least we’re getting a little traction on the data theft issues. I’m not optimistic anything substantive will happen. We’ll see… Found via Privacy Digest.
Posted by:
Categories: Policy & Regulation, Privacy How Widespread is Data Theft?This is a big deal, but until someone in Congress, the Judiciary, or the Executive branches of government are directly affected we're not going to get any protection. Our video rental records are protected by the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (VPPA) because one guy, Judge Robert Bork, got smeared by his video habits. One guy. We already have hundreds of thousands of regular Americans at risk, and with no recourse, because we have no rights to our own personal information – it belongs to mega-corporations with no obligation to protect us. Found via John Robb. More data theft, this time at Lexis/Nexis. Where is this data flowing? Offshore? Nobody seems to want to tackle that question. Also, what's the recourse if your data is stolen? Not much, particularly given the recent legal reforms enacted. Oh, those pesky class action law suits...
Posted by:
Categories: Policy & Regulation, Privacy Tuesday, March 8, 2005'Hackers' Not the Biggest Security RiskTara Wheatland at bIPlog has a good story on the real problem behind the security breaches at Checkpoint and Bank of America.
Although 'hackers' rightfully got the publicity at T-Mobile, the bigger problem is a system that confers us no rights over our own information, no penalties for companies that fail to protect it, no required disclosure when our info is purloined, and therefore no incentive at all for companies to do the right thing. It's unlikely this is going to change until there is a scandal that directly affects lawmakers. It's too bad our representative republic is so poor at representing our interests.
Tuesday, January 11, 2005But I know this isn't itI don't know the answer to the spam problem, but I know crippling e-mail for your customers doesn't qualify as a solution. For the past year or so Earthlink has been rolling out a "security upgrade" that will help them deal with the spam problem.Dear EarthLink Subscriber,The upgrade is an authenticated SMTP server. Spam is a problem, and I understand what they're trying to do. But the rankest neophyte can start to see the problems here. The login to the SMTP is my general earthlink admin login, so I'm certainly not going to give it to anyone to send e-mail. Further, for the past several years Earthlink has blocked access to port 25, 2525, and any other port that is frequently used for SMTP servers so I can't use my own or anyone else's SMTP server when on my earthlink-provided broadband connection. For all practical purposes, anyone visiting my home or office or using my broadband connection with permission, for legitimate purposes, is locked out of the e-mail system. This is earthlink's idea of progressive service -- stop the spam problem by preventing your customers from sending e-mail. Brilliant! I know you can use web mail. They haven't, as yet, decided to block port 80 and web servers (though I'm not at all convinced the geniuses in the corporate office won't think of that next.) But web mail is completely useless for people who roam around taking care of business. Unless you do all your e-mail via the web (does anyone really do that?) you end up with real sync problems on your mail client. At the very least you end up losing track of messages that you send via the web. Not your Sarbanes-Oxley seal of approval. More importantly, this upgrade has had zero impact on the amount of spam I get at my earthlink address. I no longer even use the address - haven't in years - for anything except getting my earthlink invoice and it gets filled with spam for sex, drugs, sex drugs, and offers to help poor Nigerians with their banking problems. And that's just the stuff that gets past the earthlink spaminator. In short, this is a solution that penalizes customers while having zero impact on the real problem. Welcome to the RIAA/MPAA Cro Magnon mindset. Sky Dayton and Charles Brewer were visionaries. The companies they built stood, for a while, for the very best in customer service and innovation. Today, joined under the earthlink banner, they stand as shining examples corporate torpor, institutional stupidity, and the constant, nagging, degradation that plagues everything run by committee. Time for a new ISP.
Posted by:
Categories: Privacy, Security, Technology |
SyndicationContactPresence |
|
This Page was last updated: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:06:57 GMT
License: Unless otherwise expressly stated all original material, of whatever nature, created by Terry W. Frazier and included in this website, its related pages and archives, is licensed under a Creative Commons License, some rights reserved.
Disclaimer: This is a personal website. The views expressed here are those of the author and no one else. This is also an experiment in thinking out loud, so there are no warranties as to the reliability or accuracy of anything presented here. Source material -- references, citations, quotes, photos, and other elements -- are gathered from publicly available materials and some of it may be restricted. Any trademarks used are the property of their respective creators or owners. All are reproduced under the principle of Fair Use.
|